The Teichert Method

Understand before
you intervene.

A linear five-stage method for establishing what is happening, why it is happening and what should change first.

In practice, the work is iterative. New evidence can require an earlier assumption to be tested again.

  1. 01

    Clarify

    What is supposed to happen?

    Establish the decision, intended outcome, ownership and the gap between expectation and reality.

    OutputA clear definition of the execution gap.

  2. 02

    Trace

    Where does movement stop?

    Follow the issue through the organisation rather than assuming the visible symptom is where it originates.

    OutputThe point of friction.

  3. 03

    Diagnose

    Why does it stop there?

    Examine how structural, behavioural, cognitive and relational conditions act on one another.

    OutputThe underlying mechanisms.

  4. 04

    Prioritise

    What would create the most movement?

    Identify the highest-leverage intervention rather than producing a long list of recommendations.

    OutputOne prioritised recommendation.

  5. 05

    Enable

    How will we know it is working?

    Clarify ownership, action and review. The organisation implements; Teichert helps sustain momentum where appropriate.

    OutputA 90-day action plan and review point.

Diagnose

Patterns, not personalities.

This is not diagnosis of a person.

It is analysis of how people and the organisational system act on one another.

01

Structural

Authority, decision rights, organisational design, conflicting measures and accountability.

02

Behavioural

Avoidance, escalation, defensive routines, conflict avoidance and repeated patterns.

03

Cognitive

Overload, uncertainty, competing interpretations, judgement under pressure and relevant biases.

04

Relational

Trust, candour, psychological safety, conflict, influence and competing agendas.

Intellectual foundation

Evidence-informed. Judgement-led.

The Method draws on clinical psychology, organisational psychology, behavioural science, systems thinking, judgement and decision-making, leadership, change management and psychological flexibility research.

Multiple sources of evidence are synthesised to develop a coherent explanation of what is maintaining the problem and where intervention may have the greatest effect.

The Method is a disciplined way to structure judgement. It is not presented as a scientifically validated proprietary methodology.

Confidential enquiry

When the issue matters, start with the right question.

Start with a confidential conversation.

Whether the issue sits with an executive, a team or the system around them, the first step is understanding what is actually happening.

Book a confidential conversation

Founder-led · Confidential · No obligation